a (rather strange) question about how TGraph works if anyone can help. So looking here:
cern.ch/go/BK6k. We have:
Case 0) which is a 2D histogram but we fill it with values between 0 and 1.0 (the values are a 95% exp. U.L contour if you’re wondering).
Case 1) which is the histogram above but we draw a contour between 0 and 1 using a TGraph (exact code is labelled under “CODE SNIPPET”)
Case 2) which is a 2D histogram of 1. / 2Dhistovalue now (the inverse of case 0) but now plot from 1e6 to 1 (exact code again is labelled under “CODE SNIPPET”)
So aside from asking “why are you comparing these two cases in the first place?”, my questions were:
Is it understood why Case 1 and 2 are different (I’d expect them to be the same)? It’s negligibly different at high masses but noticibly different when the 2Dhisto has holes (case 2 draws smaller holes compared to case 1 as you can tell).
Would you recommend using Case 1 or 2 when making a contour plot (or in fact neither of them)?