But, somehow, when I run the modified macro, I get the surface like this…more dense. I am using root 5.34.36 in ubuntu.
yes your root version does not have transparency on screen. Sorry.
Try may be to generate a PDF file ? the image might be transparent there.
yeah, generating pdf is helping. Thanks.
@couet Your statement is not correct. You are probably using Mac OS X / Cocoa. On Linux / X11, by default there is no screen transparency regardless of the ROOT version (one needs to switch to “GL”).
@Sandy Right in the beginning of your macro (before any canvas is created) add:
gStyle->SetCanvasPreferGL(kTRUE);
Yes … I know … it was a too short answer. Thanks to have completed my post.
#include "TF2.h"
#include "TH2.h"
#include "TGraph2DErrors.h"
#include "TAxis.h"
#include "TMath.h"
#include "TCanvas.h"
#include "TStyle.h"
Double_t g2(Double_t *x, Double_t *par) {
Double_t r1 = Double_t((x[0]-par[1])/par[2]);
Double_t r2 = Double_t((x[1]-par[3])/par[4]);
return par[0]*TMath::Exp(-0.5*(r1*r1+r2*r2));
}
Double_t fun2(Double_t *x, Double_t *par) {
Double_t *p1 = &par[0];
Double_t *p2 = &par[5];
Double_t *p3 = &par[10];
Double_t result = g2(x,p1) + g2(x,p2) + g2(x,p3);
return result;
}
void example_graph() {
gStyle->SetCanvasPreferGL(kTRUE);
gStyle->SetOptStat(0);
gStyle->SetOptTitle(0);
TCanvas *c = new TCanvas();
const Int_t npar = 15;
Double_t f2params[npar] = {100,-3,3,-3,3,160,0,0.8,0,0.9,40,4,0.7,4,0.7};
TF2 *f2 = new TF2("f2",fun2,-10,10,-10,10, npar);
f2->SetParameters(f2params);
//Create an histogram and fill it randomly with f2
TH2F *h2 = new TH2F("h2","From f2",40,-10,10,40,-10,10);
Int_t nentries = 100000;
h2->FillRandom("f2",nentries);
TGraph2DErrors *g =
new TGraph2DErrors((h2->GetNbinsX() * h2->GetNbinsY()));
for (int i = 1; i <= h2->GetNbinsX(); i++)
for (int j = 1; j <= h2->GetNbinsY(); j++) {
g->SetPoint( ((i - 1) * h2->GetNbinsY() + (j - 1)),
h2->GetXaxis()->GetBinCenter(i), // x
h2->GetYaxis()->GetBinCenter(j), // y
h2->GetBinContent(i, j) ); // z
#if 1 /* 0 or 1 */
g->SetPointError( ((i - 1) * h2->GetNbinsY() + (j - 1)),
0., // x
0., // y
h2->GetBinError(i, j) ); // z
#endif /* 0 or 1 */
}
delete h2; // no longer needed
#if 1 /* 0 or 1 */
Double_t zmin = 1.; // e.g. -1. or 0. or 1.
for (int i = (g->GetN() - 1); i >= 0; i--)
if (g->GetZ()[i] <= zmin) g->RemovePoint(i); // remove if "z" <= "zmin"
#endif /* 0 or 1 */
//Fit g with original function f2
Float_t ratio = 4*nentries/100000;
f2params[ 0] *= ratio;
f2params[ 5] *= ratio;
f2params[10] *= ratio;
f2->SetParameters(f2params);
g->Fit("f2","N");
f2->SetNpx(80);
f2->SetNpy(80);
f2->SetMaximum(800);
f2->SetLineColorAlpha(kBlack, 0.1);
f2->SetTitle("some Thing;some X;some Y;some Z");
#if 1 /* 0 or 1 */
gStyle->SetPalette(55, 0, 0.1); // 55 = kRainBow
f2->Draw("surf2 fb"); // must be drawn first (due to a bug in ROOT)
#else /* 0 or 1 */
f2->Draw("surf fb"); // must be drawn first (due to a bug in ROOT)
#endif /* 0 or 1 */
// g->SetMaximum(800);
g->SetMarkerStyle(kCircle); g->SetMarkerSize(0.5); // "p", "p0", "pcol"
g->SetMarkerColorAlpha(kBlack, 0.5); // "p", "p0"
g->SetLineColorAlpha(kBlack, 0.5); // "err"
g->Draw("err p fb same"); // "p" or "p0" or "pcol"
}
- BTW, is it possible to set error bars (E, E1, or E2) with p, p0 or pcol option?
- Is it not possible to make transparent “surf4” so that the tail of one Gaussian 2D surface can be seen under another? You people have shown example with “surf” option.
-
You could try to create and draw a TGraph2DErrors (instead of a TGraph2D). I modified the macro in my previous post so that you can play with it if you like (the “hidden surfaces” can also be made visible now with “
surf2
”), but it seems to me that in this case it is also o.k. to use a histogram drawn with “E” (as @couet shows). -
ROOT “removes” hidden lines and surfaces so you will not see the “hidden tail” with “
surf
” (unless @couet knows how to block this default behavior).
h2->SetMarkerStyle(20);
h2->SetMarkerSize(0.5);
You can try to define a transparent color palette
gStyle->SetPalette(kCherry,0,0.1);
f2->Draw("surf2 fb same");
The first one is not helping.
The second one is OK. But, it fails when I use multi-palette in same pad. I’ve used TExec as you have shown in https://root.cern.ch/doc/master/multipalette_8C.html.
I don’t know why.
May be post again the macro you have so I can have a look at it.
This one is ok:
void multi() {
gStyle->SetCanvasPreferGL(kTRUE);
auto c = new TCanvas("c","c",0,0,1000,800);
auto frame = new TH2F ("frame","Example of two surface on the same plot",20,1,3,20,1,3);
frame->SetMaximum(1.2);
auto f1 = new TF2("f1","0.1+(1-(x-2)*(x-2))*(1-(y-2)*(y-2))",1,3,1,3);
auto f2 = new TF2("f2","0.1+(2-(x-3)*(x-3))*(2-(y-3)*(y-3))",2,4,2,4);
f1->SetLineWidth(1);
f1->SetLineColor(kBlue);
f2->SetLineWidth(1);
f2->SetLineColor(kBlack);
frame->Draw("lego0");
TExec *ex1 = new TExec("ex1","gStyle->SetPalette(kBird, 0, 0.5);");
ex1->Draw();
f1->Draw("surf2 same ");
TExec *ex2 = new TExec("ex2","gStyle->SetPalette(75, 0, 0.5);");
ex2->Draw();
f2->Draw("surf2 same");
}
With your modifications, I am getting this.
with an error- “Error: Symbol kBird is not defined in current scope (tmpfile):1:”
I tried with kRed too. But, no good.
Why I don’t know.
That’s exactly what I want, but, I am getting the previous figure I posted. I am using ROOT 5.34/36 version in Ubuntu.
I have included:
#include “TStyle.h”
#include “TColor.h”
#include “TF2.h”
#include “TExec.h”
#include “TCanvas.h”
Do I need to include some more?
You would need ROOT 6 …
ROOT 6 is available on Ubuntu … I assume you can easily get it.
Is there no other option?
Can I install root 6 beside root 5?
No, some functionalities are in ROOT 6 only
Yes. you can change from a version to an other by “sourcing” $ROOTSYS/bin/thisroot.sh