I installed the just released 5.30.00 version and found that CTRL+L no longer clears the screen and also META+D no longer deletes one word forward.
Looking through the config.log file and comparing it with the one for 5.28.00d I saw the ncurses library is no longer checked for.
Is there a way of getting these nice features back?
EDIT:
I read through the release notes and it mentions the replacement of getline/editline by a new library. However it states [quote]…It implements all bash-like editor shortcuts[/quote] which I thought would cover the before mentioned shortcuts
Thanks,
Bertrand
OS X 10.6.8, used svn to compile ROOT.
meta-D works for me. On which platform does it not work for you?
I don’t like that Ctrl+L clears the screen. Let’s find a better replacement. What do you use it for - in which circumstance do you type it? Would it be maybe sufficient to print a newline and then the current prompt + current input? I.e. redraw one line down?
It might be a coincidence, but after updating my seriously outdated MacPorts installation and recompiling ROOT 5.30.00 the META+D combination works for me. The META+BACKSPACE (delete one word backward) does not work, although that might be because I needed to add that keyboard shortcut in by adding a DefaultKeyBinding.dict file to ~/Library/KeyBindings on my Mac.
As for CTRL+L to clear the screen, what do you not like about it? I have gotten so used to, it helps me visually clear my thoughts. I certainly would appreciate having that feature back
A more urgent matter though is that for some reason the latest version of ROOT is crashing on me. I sadly do not remember if it worked before I updated MacPorts and recompiled just now – I usually run such a simple test but this past week was a little hectic.
Any thoughts on why I am seeing segmentation violations?
Sorry for the delayed reply. In the mean time I have upgraded to OS X 10.7 and with 5.30/01 I am able to run ROOT just fine.
I still have the wish of being able to use CTRL+L in order to clear the screen, but if I am in the minority of users who actually care for this command then I naturally understand
Well, there are not many requests for ^L so far… We also need to compare that the the number of users hitting it accidentally, really wanting to type ^K