2，When the emitted particle energy is greater than 200 keV, it is not completely deposited in the tube, is this normal?
What gas gain do you expect in your proportional counter? If the gain is large, the avalanche simulation using AvalancheMicroscopic may take a long time; you could try using DriftLineRKF instead.
I don’t currently care about gas gain, I want to get the energy spectrum of particles in proportional counter，Is there an example of the use of DriftLineRK?
“MediumMagboltz::GetElectronCollisionRate” appears:
Rate at 40.2529 eV is not included in the current table" does it affect the accuracy of the calculation?
No, it just means that the table of collision rates is recomputed.
This example is probably a good starting point:
In the Geant4GarfieldInterface example, whether the emitted particles (not electron ion pairs) are affected by the electric field corresponding to the gasfile
Thank you, I’ll have a look at this example carefully
DriftLineRKF instead，but there are some errors 。
DriftLineRKF does not have a function AvalancheElectron; the function you need called is DriftElectron. In fact, if you are using DriftLineRKF there is no need to use AvalancheMC to first drift the electron to the wire. You can call DriftLineRKF::DriftElectron using the starting point of the electron.
hi，I am now using DriftLineRKF as shown in the image below, but the gas energy deposition does not seem to be quite right, I don’t know what is the reason for the initial decline,If I set which parameter is wrong，i use “e-” with 70 keV energy.
