Hi,
To compile CLING alone using the “clone.sh” script, I had to make the following changes:
diff --git a/lib/Interpreter/AutoloadCallback.cpp b/lib/Interpreter/AutoloadCallback.cpp
index 05835a4..8ee08ff 100644
--- a/lib/Interpreter/AutoloadCallback.cpp
+++ b/lib/Interpreter/AutoloadCallback.cpp
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ namespace cling {
Sema& sema= m_Interpreter->getSema();
unsigned id
- = sema.getDiagnostics().getCustomDiagID (DiagnosticsEngine::Level::Warning,
+ = sema.getDiagnostics().getCustomDiagID (DiagnosticsEngine::Warning,
"Note: '%0' can be found in %1");
/* unsigned idn //TODO: To be enabled after we have a way to get the full path
= sema.getDiagnostics().getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Level::Note,
diff --git a/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalExecutor.h b/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalExecutor.h
index 6403e39..99eaded 100644
--- a/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalExecutor.h
+++ b/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalExecutor.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ namespace cling {
/// if it is NULL, but the symbol second.second which must exist at the time
/// the symbol is replaced. The replacement is tried again until first us
/// found.
- std::map<std::string,std::pair<void*,std::string>> m_SymbolsToRemap;
+ std::map<std::string,std::pair<void*,std::string> > m_SymbolsToRemap;
///\breif Helper that manages when the destructor of an object to be called.
///
diff --git a/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp b/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp
index 3a7113a..b7fe9d7 100644
--- a/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp
+++ b/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ namespace cling {
// }
std::string err;
llvm::raw_fd_ostream out(outFile.data(), err,
- llvm::sys::fs::OpenFlags::F_None);
+ llvm::sys::fs::F_None);
ForwardDeclPrinter visitor(out,getSema().getSourceManager());
diff --git a/lib/Interpreter/ValueExtractionSynthesizer.cpp b/lib/Interpreter/ValueExtractionSynthesizer.cpp
index d883213..dcf1fa7 100644
--- a/lib/Interpreter/ValueExtractionSynthesizer.cpp
+++ b/lib/Interpreter/ValueExtractionSynthesizer.cpp
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ namespace {
if(RD->hasTrivialCopyConstructor()) return true;
// Lookup the copy canstructor and check its accessiblity.
if (CXXConstructorDecl* CD = S->LookupCopyingConstructor(RD, QT.getCVRQualifiers())) {
- if (!CD->isDeleted() && CD ->getAccess() == clang::AccessSpecifier::AS_public) {
+ if (!CD->isDeleted() && CD ->getAccess() == clang::AS_public) {
return true;
}
}I guess that three of them are due to recent changes in clang source code.
I’m also wondering what’s your current experience with CLING and heavily templated code? I was super excited to use Eigen (eigen.tuxfamily.org) through CLING, but unfortunately I got more segfaults than successes.