Possible bug in RDataFrame Define with lambdas?

Hi Day,

I guess it is expected and known behaviour that you need a return there.

I also stumbled in the same problem a while ago.
You can see detailed Enrico’s reply in the post below on why is that the case:

as far as I understood, the issue is that in your expression inside lambda function you already have a return word. So RDF does not automatically put any returns inside to avoid confusion, so you have to write it manually in the beginning in this case.

I agree a better documentation&example for this case would be nice.

cheers,
Bohdan

2 Likes